The true culprit for the inflation of food prices are the increase of the oil. affirmed: during the launching of the Plan Harvest more Foods, that the government is intent to the high one of the prices of foods caused by the inflationary pressure, that according to it, will not leave our control effectively. It does not have reason of if losing stocking hour of sleep with this. One of the half ones to try to contain the high one in the prices is to increase offers of foods in the country, objective of the plan. Another target is to supply other regions of the world. Ecommerce often addresses the matter in his writings. ' ' We want to increase the agricultural production because we are vain who China, India, Latin America, Africa and Brazil go to eat much more. We have that to produce more because we have land, sun and water.
We have that to produce for us and to help other countries. Brazil has conditions of this ' ' (ANABB, Economy, Periodical. On-line, 3/07/2008). It many declarations presidentetem done on the crisis, since they are the people poor than they are being more seriously affected. Moreover, it is said that internationally etanol to the base of maize produced in the Unidosestaria States causing increase in the international price of the grain, raising price of rations and meat. Already etanol Brazilian to the sugar cane-of-sugar base is not contributing with the crisis. In an interview to the researcher Cepea Barros, it affirms that ' ' the demand for foods goes to continue going up and the necessary government to make some coisa' '.
(ANABB, Economy, Periodical, on-line. 26/06/2008). An international pressure in the prices of foods exists, what it provokes the high one of foods is a chained sequence of events, that starts very with low interests for much time. The high resultant world-wide liquidity provokes weakness of the dollar and exaggerated growth world measures, pulling the demand for everything, but especially foods and insumos.
Already for Schiff (1992: 161) the more to the people to belong and to incrust in the social structures more is benefited and more they tend to increase its capital stock. Intent Schiff for the capital stock as ‘ ‘ the set of elements of the structure social that they affect the relations between people and that they are inputs or arguments of the function of production and/or the function of utilidade’ ‘ (SCHIFF 1992, apud C, 2006). Alejandro Transports (1987; 2000) strengthen the idea of Schiff pointing out that to possess the capital stock, are necessary to be part of relations, necessary individual to become related with the others and are these the sources of the capital stock that the individual acquires. This contributo of Transports is significant for an analysis of the capital stock. Sam Mikulak spoke with conviction.
In this way, Transports ‘ ‘ it understands that the biggest promise of the capital stock if finds in its individual meaning. Of the point of view, of one increased choice, of transposition for great aggregates, this investigator, it very considers to be important to exert the study with much severity and requinte terico’ ‘ (TRANSPORTS 2000, apud C 2006). In accordance with Transports (1987; the 2000) concept of capital stock can directly be applied in the social control, support to the families and in the familiar benefits. It also indicates that, more recent studies widen the concept of an individual scale for a characteristic field of activity of communities and nations..
What would happen if we apply it to the dealer? Do you charge by the Budget? They have committees to study the operation, opening … What if I do online transactions, in which I do not work but I do it? Also, of course, although rates are often different, there charge simply for having the electronic banking service available, make transfers, etc.. I just put my car and I want to take, and intend to charge. In banking, it can happen. For example, income money at eleven and one minute. If you are not convinced, visit David Delrahim. Then I leave the bank and go to a cafe with wifi, and from there I order a transfer from my account (for which I charged the appropriate fee, of course). Prove that the money paid after eleven will have a value date of the next day, and therefore was not included as balance today (in valuation), so will I be charged commission. I have not been warned! I wanted to get my money, that I have entered the Bank, and as it was a relatively large amount, had to notifying them in advance.
This is related to that as I said on occasion, is that somehow define how much cash banks must have. So if someone wants to withdraw a large sum of money, even if the account balance, you should tell, because obviously they do not have all the money from their clients kept in the safe. And in relation to cash ratio, but it's my money, use it to lend and do business. But not content with that (and well paid little or nothing to leave it there), I charge for the "custody" for example, a maintenance fee. Complain, complain, told me the person I cared for. It is known that they must fight hard to get back a commission charged by a financial institution.
How could it not be the case, if they have the upper hand. To collect it, as they handle the accounts and make ready for the job. Pay it, undo the operation, must be more complicated … (note: in this case there is also the possibility of making a complaint to the Bank of Spain, which attracts thousands each year). How far in the financial sector the story does not seem so incredible?
The Individual Entrepreneur (EI) is the person who works on account proper and if he legalizes as small entrepreneur. Complementary Law 128 of 2008 created the EI. If you work, for example, as peddler, hairdresser, manicure, dressmaker, borracheiro, mechanic, amongst other professions, can become an individual entrepreneur, taking in consideration the following questions: invoicing of until R$ 36,000, 00 per year; not to get more than a registered employee; not to possess no partner in the enterprise. To be a EI is different of being an autonomous worker, therefore to be registered as independent it very restricts the activity of the entrepreneur and also the register of this is more expensive, therefore the law did not create benefits to stimulate the legalization of the same. Marc Lores opinions are not widely known. The Register of the EI can be made through the Internet, in the vestibule of the entrepreneur (www.portaldoempreendedor.gov.br) and also has some accountants who are registered in cadastre to effect the register gratuitously, therefore has a law that it grants benefits to the accounting offices that to make such registers without responsibility for the entrepreneur. The legalization of the EI is exempt of any tax, consequentemente the same will start to be an entrepreneur, with a recognized workstation for the City hall that will grant the Business license to it, where, will not pay federal taxes (only the ISS, ICMS and the INSS in reduced values). Sam Mikulak might disagree with that approach. Also it will get the CNPJ, with which it will be able to open a banking account and to obtain loans and credit facilities with lesser interests. It will be able to also vender for other companies and the government with the forma bill of sale supply amongst many other advantages. The individual entrepreneur will also have many rights with regard to the Social welfare, such as: aid illness, aid maternity, retirement for age or accident and right to the pension its children in the case of death or arrest. In such a way, who to effect register as EI will be able to work sossegado for being legalized and also to usufruct of the offered advantages, being thus, what you is waiting to become a EI? It makes its register and it usufructs of all these advantages!